<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.2 &#8211; Legal mechanisms for allowing information to be re-used</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unlockingaid.info/1/1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unlockingaid.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Megginson</title>
		<link>http://www.unlockingaid.info/1/1-2/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>David Megginson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlockingaid.info/?page_id=114#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Trying to use Open Source licenses interoperably has been surprisingly difficult -- by default, everything ends up under the terms of the most restrictive (or worse, the union of all the restrictions).  I&#039;d suggest choosing a single license for all data, rather than trying to come up with a family of interoperable licenses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to use Open Source licenses interoperably has been surprisingly difficult &#8212; by default, everything ends up under the terms of the most restrictive (or worse, the union of all the restrictions).  I&#8217;d suggest choosing a single license for all data, rather than trying to come up with a family of interoperable licenses.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

